01.09.2011., četvrtak

O Rings Material O rings material. Mothers rings designs material Concerned with physical needs or desires Concerned with the matter of reasoning, not its form the tangible substance that goes into the makeup of a physical object; "coal is a hard black material"; "wheat is the stuff they use to make bread" derived from or composed of matter; "the material universe" Denoting or consisting of physical objects rather than the mind or spirit concerned with worldly rather than spiritual interests; "material possessions"; "material wealth"; "material comforts" o rings A gasket in the form of a ring with a circular cross section, typically made of pliable material, used to seal connections in pipes, tubes, etc A small plastic piece, shaped like a donut, which is used to hold the arch wires in the brackets on your teeth. are generally used as dynamic seals for shafts and are available in many different sizes and materials. An O-ring, also known as a packing, or a toric joint, is a mechanical gasket in the shape of a torus; it is a loop of elastomer with a disc-shaped cross-section, designed to be seated in a groove and compressed during assembly between two or more parts, creating a seal at the interface. o rings material - Fredrix 5542 Fredrix 5542 Stretched Watercolor Canvas, 24 by 36-Inch Fredrix Pre-Stretched Watercolor Canvas is a 100-percent cotton artist canvas which combines the texture of a natural, woven fabric with a specially formulated gesso designed for all water-based paints. It is versatile and durable. It will not tear like paper and you can lightly lift out pigment or completely wash out your painting surface without damaging the canvas surface. The canvas is stapled onto the back of standard stretcher bars. Paint on all four edges and hang it with or without a frame. 85% (17) Today's O'bama Mass Extinction The following is an excerpt from the article “Laying bare the myth of "the left"”, by David Sirota on Salon.com: In the Obama era, the "the left's" destructive, party-over-principles motivation has become impossible to hide, especially recently. Behold, for instance, major environmental groups' attitude toward the Gulf oil spill. We know that before the disaster, President Obama recklessly pushed to expand offshore drilling. More than 3.5 million dollars has been given to candidates by BP over the last 20 years, with the largest single donation, 77,051 dollars, going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. We also know that his Interior Department gave British Petroleum's rig a "categorical exclusion" from environmental scrutiny and, according to the New York Times, "gave permission to BP and dozens of other oil companies to drill in the Gulf without first getting required [environmental] permits." Worse, we know that after the spill, the same Interior Department kept issuing "categorical exclusions" for new Gulf oil operations, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar still refuses "to rule out continued use of categorical exclusions," as the Denver Post reported (heckuva job, Kenny!). Undoubtedly, had this been the behavior of a Republican administration, "the left's" big environmental organizations would be scheduling D.C. protests and calling for firings, if not criminal charges. Yet, somehow, there are no protests. Somehow, there have been almost no calls for the resignation of Salazar, who oversaw this disaster and who, before that, took $323,000 in campaign contributions from energy interests and backed more offshore drilling as a U.S. senator. Somehow, facing environmental apocalypse, there has been mostly silence from "the left." But, howsoever, O’bama and Salazar may have set-up the conditions for the Oil Spill they were not to be physically available for the actual execution of the Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. That was left up to their campaign contributors BP, Haliburton and the rest of dummies who will invariably qualify for the $75 million dollar federal limit on liability with respect to oil spills. For information on that I recommend the following article titled “final test would have signaled seal trouble, Team sent home before explosion” published Thursday, May 20, 2010 By David Hammer Staff writer of The Times-Picayune [dhammer@timespicayune.com or 504.826.3322.] that reads as follows: BP hired a top oilfield service company to test the strength of cement linings on the Deepwater Horizon's well, but sent the firm's workers home 11 hours before the rig exploded April 20 without performing a final check that a top cementing company executive called "the only test that can really determine the actual effectiveness" of the well's seal. A spokesman for the testing firm, Schlumberger, said BP had a Schlumberger team and equipment for sending acoustic testing lines down the well "on standby" from April 18 to April 20. But BP never asked the Schlumberger crew to perform the acoustic test and sent its members back to Louisiana on a regularly scheduled helicopter flight at 11 a.m., Schlumberger spokesman Stephen T. Harris said. At a few minutes before 10 p.m., a belch of natural gas shot out of the well, up a riser pipe to the rig above, igniting massive explosions, killing 11 crewmembers and sending millions of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf. The rig's owner, Transocean, blames failed cement seals, installed by Halliburton, for the disastrous blowout. But while politicians and media have focused on the finger-pointing by BP, Transocean and Halliburton executives in congressional hearings over the past 10 days, Halliburton's representative at those hearings, Tim Probert, has quietly provided some clues about what might have gone wrong. First, he went into detail in two committee hearings May 11 about the tests that were done to check his company's cement job -- called positive and negative pressure tests -- and a third test that BP never asked for. That test is called a "cement bond log," which records data collected from wires run down the well to measure sounds that indicate whether there are any weaknesses or spaces in the cement. Probert told a Senate committee last week that the cement bond log is "the only test that can really determine the actual effectiveness of the bond between the cement sheets, the formation and the casing itself." Gregory McCormack, director of the Petroleum Extension Service at the University of Texas, called the cement bond log the "gold standard" of cement tests. It records detailed, 360-degree representations of the well and can show where the cement isn't adhering fully to the casing and where there may be paths for gas or oil to get into the hole. Schlumberger's Harris said the contractor was r Today's O'bama Mass Extinction The following is an excerpt from the article “Laying bare the myth of "the left"”, by David Sirota on Salon.com: In the Obama era, the "the left's" destructive, party-over-principles motivation has become impossible to hide, especially recently. Behold, for instance, major environmental groups' attitude toward the Gulf oil spill. We know that before the disaster, President Obama recklessly pushed to expand offshore drilling. More than 3.5 million dollars has been given to candidates by BP over the last 20 years, with the largest single donation, 77,051 dollars, going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. We also know that his Interior Department gave British Petroleum's rig a "categorical exclusion" from environmental scrutiny and, according to the New York Times, "gave permission to BP and dozens of other oil companies to drill in the Gulf without first getting required [environmental] permits." Worse, we know that after the spill, the same Interior Department kept issuing "categorical exclusions" for new Gulf oil operations, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar still refuses "to rule out continued use of categorical exclusions," as the Denver Post reported (heckuva job, Kenny!). Undoubtedly, had this been the behavior of a Republican administration, "the left's" big environmental organizations would be scheduling D.C. protests and calling for firings, if not criminal charges. Yet, somehow, there are no protests. Somehow, there have been almost no calls for the resignation of Salazar, who oversaw this disaster and who, before that, took $323,000 in campaign contributions from energy interests and backed more offshore drilling as a U.S. senator. Somehow, facing environmental apocalypse, there has been mostly silence from "the left." But, howsoever, O’bama and Salazar may have set-up the conditions for the Oil Spill they were not to be physically available for the actual execution of the Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. That was left up to their campaign contributors BP, Haliburton and the rest of dummies who will invariably qualify for the $75 million dollar federal limit on liability with respect to oil spills. For information on that I recommend the following article titled “final test would have signaled seal trouble, Team sent home before explosion” published Thursday, May 20, 2010 By David Hammer Staff writer of The Times-Picayune [dhammer@timespicayune.com or 504.826.3322.] that reads as follows: BP hired a top oilfield service company to test the strength of cement linings on the Deepwater Horizon's well, but sent the firm's workers home 11 hours before the rig exploded April 20 without performing a final check that a top cementing company executive called "the only test that can really determine the actual effectiveness" of the well's seal. A spokesman for the testing firm, Schlumberger, said BP had a Schlumberger team and equipment for sending acoustic testing lines down the well "on standby" from April 18 to April 20. But BP never asked the Schlumberger crew to perform the acoustic test and sent its members back to Louisiana on a regularly scheduled helicopter flight at 11 a.m., Schlumberger spokesman Stephen T. Harris said. At a few minutes before 10 p.m., a belch of natural gas shot out of the well, up a riser pipe to the rig above, igniting massive explosions, killing 11 crewmembers and sending millions of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf. The rig's owner, Transocean, blames failed cement seals, installed by Halliburton, for the disastrous blowout. But while politicians and media have focused on the finger-pointing by BP, Transocean and Halliburton executives in congressional hearings over the past 10 days, Halliburton's representative at those hearings, Tim Probert, has quietly provided some clues about what might have gone wrong. First, he went into detail in two committee hearings May 11 about the tests that were done to check his company's cement job -- called positive and negative pressure tests -- and a third test that BP never asked for. That test is called a "cement bond log," which records data collected from wires run down the well to measure sounds that indicate whether there are any weaknesses or spaces in the cement. Probert told a Senate committee last week that the cement bond log is "the only test that can really determine the actual effectiveness of the bond between the cement sheets, the formation and the casing itself." Gregory McCormack, director of the Petroleum Extension Service at the University of Texas, called the cement bond log the "gold standard" of cement tests. It records detailed, 360-degree representations of the well and can show where the cement isn't adhering fully to the casing and where there may be paths for gas or oil to get into the hole. Schlumberger's Harris said the contractor was re Similar posts: 2mm eternity ring 7 carat diamond engagement rings gold mood ring white gold green amethyst rings engagement ring jewelry moissanite professional ring sizer lost class ring 14k yellow gold ring settings

- 00:22 - Komentari (0) - Isprintaj - #